2016 MLB Projected Standings & Preseason Ratings
March 24, 2016 – by David Hess
With MLB Opening Day 2016 approaching, it’s time to release our MLB preseason ratings and MLB projected standings.
The main purpose of these ratings is to provide a data-driven starting point for our MLB projected standings. They also drive our MLB postseason seed projections and our other MLB season projection details. These include fully automated win-loss predictions, playoff chances, and World Series win odds. All the info will be updated every single day of the season to reflect the latest results and the most up to date MLB power ratings.
How We Create The Ratings
In other sports, we use our own data and models to come up with independent estimates of team quality. We then compare those to the market, and to other projections. For MLB, however, we’re simply not at the leading edge of preseason analysis.
So rather than trying to create our own preseason ratings, and deriving a season projection from those, our initial MLB projected standings are based on a weighted average of betting market info and projected standings from other well respected sources.
Essentially, we combine projected win total info from various sources to into a consensus win total projection for every team. Then we p out what preseason team ratings would lead to those exact projections.
We’re still publishing these in the interest of full disclosure, so that you know what the initial rating in our projection system was for each team. But we’re most definitely not recommending that you use these MLB projected standings to go place preseason bets.
A Seemingly Narrow Win Distribution
You may look at the projections below and think that they aren’t extreme enough. In a way, you’d be right — the best team in the league will almost certainly win more than the 93 games we’ve forecast for the Cubs, and the worst (we’re looking at you, Braves and Phillies) will likely lose more than 96.
However, picking which teams will wildly exceed expectations is rather tricky. On average these conservative predictions should provide a less biased starting point than more aggressive ones.
If you’d like to see our more aggressive best case and worst case scenarios for each team, check out their team projections page. Here are the New York Yankees projections as an example. Follow that link and you’ll find a chart showing the projected odds of the Yankees winning any specific number of games. It also includes a list of their toughest & easiest games, and a table showing how their chances of winning the World Series change depending on what seed they get in the playoffs.
2016 MLB Projected Standings Highlights
Starting with consensus win projections and working backwards to ratings led to some interesting results this season. Here’s the most surprising thing that caught our eye:
The five highest-rated teams are all from the American League (Red Sox, Astros, Blue Jays, Indians, Yankees).However, the five teams with the most projected wins are all from the National League (Cubs, Dodgers, Mets, Nationals, Giants).
How can the top rated teams all be from the AL, yet the NL teams have the most projected wins? If you’re a Braves or Phillies fan, you might be able to guess the answer:
The eight lowest-rated teams are all in the NL.
That’s right. When we follow the consensus win projections to their logical conclusion, we find that the world at large thinks the top of the AL is great, but the bottom of the NL is terrible. So bad, in fact, that the best NL teams will pad their records enough to win more games than the best AL teams.
That effect carries over to World Series championship odds as well. Just like the betting markets, we project the Cubs with the best chance to win the title, despite having them ranked only 6th in our preseason ratings. That’s in large part because they have a much easier path to the playoffs than any AL team:
The only AL team with a greater than 50% chance to make the playoffs is Houston (51%).Five NL teams have a better chance, capped by the Cubs at 77%.
Baseball isn’t like the NBA, where the Warriors and Spurs are so much better than every other team that it would be a shock if someone else wins the title. The MLB Playoffs involve a great deal more luck. Having a large edge in your chance to reach the playoffs can easily outweigh a slightly lower team rating. That’s how the Cubs can end up as our projected most likely World Series winner.
Here is how the rest of playoffs would play out, if these projections ended up being spot on (which, to be clear, is very unlikely):
Wild Card Round: Nationals over Giants; Blue Jays over YankeesDivision Round: Cubs over Nationals; Dodgers over Mets; Red Sox over Blue Jays; Astros over IndiansLeague Championship Series: Cubs over Dodgers; Astros over Red SoxWorld Series: Cubs over Astros
Full Preseason 2016 MLB Projected Standings
| 2016 TeamRankings.com MLB Preseason Projected Standings | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American League | |||||||
| AL East | W | L | TR Rank | Playoffs | Win Div | Top Seed | WS Champs |
| Boston | 87 | 75 | 1 | 48.6% | 28.7% | 12.5% | 6.6% |
| Toronto | 86 | 76 | 3 | 46.3% | 25.5% | 10.7% | 5.9% |
| NY Yankees | 85 | 78 | 5 | 38.8% | 21.5% | 8.4% | 4.7% |
| Tampa Bay | 83 | 79 | 7 | 33.1% | 16.8% | 6.5% | 3.7% |
| Baltimore | 77 | 85 | 18 | 17.4% | 7.5% | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| AL Central | W | L | TR Rank | Playoffs | Win Div | Top Seed | WS Champs |
| Cleveland | 86 | 76 | 4 | 48.3% | 33.1% | 11.8% | 6.1% |
| Kansas City | 83 | 79 | 9 | 35.8% | 21.9% | 7.0% | 3.8% |
| Chi Sox | 81 | 81 | 12 | 28.5% | 17.1% | 4.5% | 2.8% |
| Detroit | 81 | 81 | 13 | 26.1% | 15.3% | 4.3% | 2.5% |
| Minnesota | 79 | 83 | 17 | 21.8% | 12.6% | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| AL West | W | L | TR Rank | Playoffs | Win Div | Top Seed | WS Champs |
| Houston | 87 | 75 | 2 | 50.9% | 36.4% | 12.1% | 6.8% |
| Seattle | 83 | 79 | 8 | 36.8% | 23.9% | 6.4% | 4.0% |
| Texas | 82 | 80 | 11 | 31.8% | 19.6% | 6.0% | 3.3% |
| LA Angels | 79 | 83 | 16 | 21.9% | 12.3% | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Oakland | 75 | 87 | 22 | 14.0% | 7.8% | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| National League | |||||||
| NL East | W | L | TR Rank | Playoffs | Win Div | Top Seed | WS Champs |
| NY Mets | 89 | 73 | 15 | 65.0% | 46.9% | 14.5% | 5.9% |
| Washington | 88 | 74 | 19 | 57.0% | 38.1% | 10.8% | 4.5% |
| Miami | 78 | 84 | 24 | 22.5% | 11.9% | 2.2% | 1.1% |
| Atlanta | 67 | 95 | 29 | 3.3% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Philadelphia | 66 | 96 | 30 | 2.7% | 1.4% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| NL Central | W | L | TR Rank | Playoffs | Win Div | Top Seed | WS Champs |
| Chi Cubs | 93 | 69 | 6 | 76.6% | 56.5% | 25.8% | 10.3% |
| St. Louis | 84 | 78 | 20 | 41.5% | 18.5% | 6.2% | 2.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 84 | 78 | 21 | 41.1% | 19.1% | 6.4% | 2.9% |
| Milwaukee | 72 | 90 | 27 | 9.3% | 3.5% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| Cincinnati | 71 | 91 | 28 | 7.5% | 2.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| NL West | W | L | TR Rank | Playoffs | Win Div | Top Seed | WS Champs |
| LA Dodgers | 91 | 72 | 10 | 67.4% | 46.5% | 17.6% | 7.5% |
| SF Giants | 88 | 75 | 14 | 55.9% | 31.4% | 10.5% | 4.9% |
| Arizona | 80 | 82 | 23 | 28.9% | 13.7% | 3.5% | 1.8% |
| San Diego | 74 | 88 | 25 | 12.7% | 4.9% | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Colorado | 72 | 90 | 26 | 8.5% | 3.4% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
If you liked this post, please share it. Thank you! Twitter Facebook
NFL Football Pool Picks NFL Survivor Pool Picks NCAA Bracket Picks College Bowl Pool Picks College Football Pool Picks NFL Picks NBA Picks MLB Picks College Football Picks College Basketball Picks NFL Predictions NBA Predictions MLB Predictions College Football Predictions College Basketball Predictions NFL Spread Picks NBA Spread Picks MLB Spread Picks College Football Spread Picks College Basketball Spread Picks NFL Rankings NBA Rankings MLB Rankings College Football Rankings College Basketball Rankings NFL Stats NBA Stats MLB Stats College Football Stats College Basketball Stats NFL Odds NBA Odds MLB Odds College Football Odds College Basketball Odds A product ofTeamRankings BlogAboutTeamJobsContact
© 2005-2024 Team Rankings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Statistical data provided by Gracenote.
TeamRankings.com is not affiliated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA®) or March Madness Athletic Association, neither of which has supplied, reviewed, approved or endorsed the material on this site. TeamRankings.com is solely responsible for this site but makes no guarantee about the accuracy or completeness of the information herein.
Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy
